Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:04:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/50] 4.9.170-stable review
Message-ID: <20190420070414.GA24855@kroah.com>
References: <20190418160422.455656724@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20190419193926.GA10320@roeck-us.net>
 <20190419201637.GA5347@roeck-us.net>
 <20190420011245.GG17719@sasha-vm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190420011245.GG17719@sasha-vm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:12:45PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 01:16:37PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:39:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:57:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.170 release.
> > > > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat Apr 20 16:03:22 UTC 2019.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
> > > Failed builds:
> > > 	i386:tools/perf
> > > 	x86_64:tools/perf
> > 
> > Caused by "tools include: Adopt linux/bits.h". That isn't really
> > a bug fix, and since it is the last commit in the perf directory
> > it isn't needed either. Reverting it fixes the problem.
> 
> Indeed. I'll remove it from all branches since it doesn't look like a
> fix to begin with.

My fault with that one, sorry about that.

greg k-h