Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264037AbUDFWZW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:25:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264040AbUDFWZV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:25:21 -0400 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:526 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264037AbUDFWZQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:25:16 -0400 Message-ID: <40733332.9040205@techsource.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 18:46:10 -0400 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergiy Lozovsky CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Horst von Brand , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel stack challenge References: <20040406213827.35076.qmail@web40509.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040406213827.35076.qmail@web40509.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 690 Lines: 19 Sergiy Lozovsky wrote: > It's misunderstanding. There are no any recursion > restrictions. Author of particular security model > (LISP program) should avoid recursions; it's not very > hard actually. When we write program at language other > than LISP - we rarely use recursion. Yes, it's against > LISP style, but not a big problem. If you are going to throw away the most basic and fundamental feature of LISP for this..... why use LISP? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/