Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263673AbUDGOdw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:33:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263682AbUDGOdw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:33:52 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:36311 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263673AbUDGOdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:33:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:27:48 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Andi Kleen Cc: David Gibson , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: RFC: COW for hugepages Message-ID: <20040407142748.GO26474@krispykreme> References: <20040407074239.GG18264@zax> <20040407143447.4d8f08af.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040407143447.4d8f08af.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 18 > Implementing this for ppc64 only is just wrong. Before you do this > I would suggest to factor out the common code in the various hugetlbpage > implementations and then implement it in common code. I could say a similar thing about your i386 specific largepage modifications in the NUMA api :) We should probably look at making lots of the arch specific hugetlb code common but im not sure we want that to become a prerequisite for merging NUMA API and hugepage COW. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/