Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263701AbUDGOwV (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:52:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263697AbUDGOwU (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:52:20 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:10112 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263704AbUDGOvg (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:51:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:55:24 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200404071455.i37EtOn8000182@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: Redeeman , LKML Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <1081348038.5049.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> References: <20040407125406.209FC39834A@ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com> <1081348038.5049.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> Subject: Re: Rewrite Kernel Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 996 Lines: 22 > but, ofcourse, this would require all development to stop on linux(if > the linux developers should do it). > and that isnt possible. so therefore development goes on to just do the > best thing possible with what we got today. Not really - there are free, open source OS projects other than Linux in fairly advanced stages technically, (I.E. they do more than just boot, and can run real applications). However, to take my attention away from Linux, an OS project would probably have to be fairly revolutionary, and represent something that I honestly believed could not ever be practically achieved with the Linux model. The only obstacle that I can see to creating something better than the Linux kernel, is that nobody is doing it yet. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/