Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261179AbUDGVrP (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:47:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261169AbUDGVrP (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:47:15 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:19423 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264198AbUDGVpf (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:45:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 07:41:16 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Andi Kleen Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: RFC: COW for hugepages Message-ID: <20040407214116.GA18493@krispykreme> References: <20040407074239.GG18264@zax> <20040407143447.4d8f08af.ak@suse.de> <20040407142748.GO26474@krispykreme> <20040407165041.23d8d82a.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040407165041.23d8d82a.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 534 Lines: 17 > All they did was to modify the code to lazy faulting. That is > architecture specific > > (and add the mpol code, but that was pretty minor) > > COW is a different thing though. Why is it architecture specific? I dont understand why you cant make lazy faulting common code. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/