Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261296AbUDGXwe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:52:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261252AbUDGXwe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:52:34 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:45785 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261262AbUDGXwd (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:52:33 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Joshua Kwan Subject: Re: [2.4] bttv and sparc64 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:52:29 -0700 Message-ID: References: <873c7gl0rv.fsf@bytesex.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-68-126-186-145.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 21 On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 09:12:20 +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote: > Joshua Kwan writes: > >> Many modules on sparc64 seem to require I2C support to >> compile correctly. Why do they not depend on CONFIG_I2C? > > In my source tree bttv (correctly) depends on CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT ... > > eskarina kraxel ~# grep BT848 /work/bk/2.4/linux-2.4.23/drivers/media/video/Config.in > dep_tristate ' BT848 Video For Linux' CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848 $CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV $CONFIG_PCI $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT $CONFIG_SOUND This is true, but none of the options below CONFIG_I2C are visible to sparc64 at all. (It's a broken dep, at least as far as I can see. I can't find anything in the menuconfig system for ARCH=sparc64 about I2C.) Clue me in, anyone? -- Joshua Kwan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/