Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262273AbUDHTKG (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:10:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262286AbUDHTKF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:10:05 -0400 Received: from alfie.demon.co.uk ([80.177.172.67]:42503 "EHLO alfie.demon.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262273AbUDHTKD (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:10:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 20:10:01 +0100 From: Nick Holloway To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add missing MODULE_PARAM to dummy.c (and MAINTAINERShip) Message-ID: <20040408191001.GA7450@pyrites.org.uk> References: <20040408174823.GA13335@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408174823.GA13335@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 22 On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 07:48:23PM +0200, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote: > A patch follows to (hopefully) correct this. Another patch includes an > entry in the MAINTAINERS file for the "dummy" module. However, I suppose > the module author (Nick Holloway) will come up and say if he should > still be considered as the module maintainer, so to add the correct > information to the MAINTAINERS file. I wouldn't consider myself the maintainer. I did the original development to get it into the tree (nearly 10 years ago), but changes have been made by others. I don't think an explicit maintainer needs to be mentioned, as it falls under the umbrella of network maintainance. -- `O O' | Nick.Holloway@pyrites.org.uk // ^ \\ | http://www.pyrites.org.uk/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/