Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261347AbUDIOZH (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:25:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261375AbUDIOZG (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:25:06 -0400 Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.28]:35466 "EHLO mwinf0301.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261347AbUDIOZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:25:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:30:17 +0000 From: Philippe Elie To: Jon Grimm Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix Message-ID: <20040409163017.GA392@zaniah> References: <4076A7AE.8020101@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4076A7AE.8020101@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2005 Lines: 46 On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 at 08:39 +0000, Jon Grimm wrote: > Hmmm.... > > I see that the following patch got pulled in by Andrew: > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/diffs/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c@1.85?nav=index.html|src/|src/arch|src/arch/i386|src/arch/i386/kernel|hist/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c > > The patch had a couple bugs: > http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2004/Mar/4152.html > > But the patch was pulled out entirely by Linus: > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/diffs/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c@1.88?nav=index.html|src/|src/arch|src/arch/i386|src/arch/i386/kernel|hist/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c > > Was it determined that the fix was bogus? damaging? fixable? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107840458123059&w=2 what's the right fix ? This patch fix timer_ack in three place, the two last look like typo (spurious ';' after if ()), the first chunk apparently cause higher temp on some mobo. > I ask as I see behavior identical for which this patch seems to have > been originally carved up for (buggy SMM BIOS at fault, but this was a > workaround in the OS). > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101604672921823&w=2 > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0203.2/0698.html > > Its a fair answer to force the BIOS vendor to fix, but in the meantime, > I'm trying to figure out how safe/unsafe the workaround patch is ? > I've ran on it overnight (with the semi-colon's fixed) and it hasn't > exhibited the troubling behavior (where timer interrupts seem stuck or > in some cases just extremely slow.... and the 8259 IMR is mucked up when > Linux isn't even touching anymore). I agree but actually it cause trouble for non bugged mobo, can this fixed ? regards, Philippe Elie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/