Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262418AbUDKRJE (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:09:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262429AbUDKRJE (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:09:04 -0400 Received: from 168.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.168]:2573 "HELO port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262418AbUDKRJC (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:09:02 -0400 From: Denis Vlasenko To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Subject: Re: List of oversized inlines Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 20:08:52 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: Matt Mackall , linux-kernel References: <200404111905.49443.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <200404111951.34734.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20040411170340.GB1287@gallifrey> In-Reply-To: <20040411170340.GB1287@gallifrey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404112008.52527.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 779 Lines: 26 On Sunday 11 April 2004 20:03, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > Be careful in making judgements about the inlining behaviour based > on sizes on one architecture. The size of these functions > is likely to be radically different on different architectures, and > the break off point of cache/RAM usage v branch cost is also likely > to be entirely different. I know. Other arches can rerun my script and compare results. I worry more about inline bogon(int i) { if(i) { ... } } style inlines. My methos won't catch 'em -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/