Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263880AbUDNEzE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:55:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263881AbUDNEzE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:55:04 -0400 Received: from pixpat.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.241]:15832 "EHLO zircon.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263880AbUDNEy7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:54:59 -0400 Message-ID: <407CC3DB.3070300@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:53:47 -0500 From: Jon Grimm Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: Ross Dickson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phil.el@wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: io_apic & timer_ack fix References: <200404100337.21730.ross@datscreative.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 749 Lines: 28 Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: >On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Ross Dickson wrote: > >> > Was it determined that the fix was bogus? damaging? fixable? >> >>I thought the patch was OK with typos fixed. >> >> > > I consider it final. > > I 've been running the patch on a 2.4.21 code base. I note that /proc/interrupts shows NMI interrupts coming in fast and furious, where without it there were none. I'm not sure what to think of this. Any idea whether this could/should be expected? Best Regards, Jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/