Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264258AbUDNPL7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:11:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264254AbUDNPL6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:11:58 -0400 Received: from rtlab.med.cornell.edu ([140.251.145.175]:58579 "EHLO openlab.rtlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264258AbUDNPLu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:11:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:11:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Calin A. Culianu" X-X-Sender: To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Subject: Re: Shielded CPUs In-Reply-To: <1081953482.11976.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 962 Lines: 24 On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 16:23, Calin A. Culianu wrote: > > This might be a bit off-topic (and might belong in the rtlinux mailing > > list), but I wanted people's opinion on LKML... > > > > There's an article in the May 2004 Linux Journal about some CPU affinity > > features in Redhawk Linux that allow a process and a set of interrupts to > > be locked to a particular CPU for the purposes of improving real-time > > performance. > > well you can do both of those already in 2.6 and in all recent vendor > 2.4's that I know of..... no patches needed. Cool.. it's still not, strictly speaking, _hard_ realtime, though, is it? Simply really good soft-realtime, right? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/