Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261787AbUDNVD6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:03:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261746AbUDNVD5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:03:57 -0400 Received: from smtp2.rz.tu-harburg.de ([134.28.205.13]:53958 "EHLO smtp2.rz.tu-harburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261753AbUDNVBo (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:01:44 -0400 From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?q?Kr=F6ner?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IO-APIC on nforce2 [PATCH] Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:01:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: Len Brown , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , ross@datscreative.com.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404142301.33153.christian.kroener@tu-harburg.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1039 Lines: 25 > Just would like to add that if we cannot get Maciej's 8259 ack patch > back into the distro then we need an if statement in the check_timer() > to turn off timer_ack for nforce2 or Christian might get his hi-load back > and certainly nmi_debug=1 won't work. > > e.g. for 2.4.26-rc2 io_apic.c line 1613 or 2.6.5 line 2180 > if (pin1 != -1) { > /* > * Ok, does IRQ0 through the IOAPIC work? > */ > + if(acpi_skip_timer_override) > + timer_ack=0; > unmask_IO_APIC_irq(0); > Also on mainline 2.6.5 this if-statement doesn't seem to be necessary. Len's patch worked on this kernel as well, setting the timer interrupt to IO-APIC-edge and there is no strange hi-load anymore too. thanks, christian. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/