Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 16:24:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 16:23:59 -0500 Received: from riker.dsl.inconnect.com ([209.140.76.229]:23407 "EHLO ns1.rikers.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 16:23:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3A05CE91.3979B1B6@Rikers.org> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 14:18:09 -0700 From: Tim Riker Organization: Riker Family (http://rikers.org/) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test9vaio i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: non-gcc linux? In-Reply-To: <3A05C888.7558E0F0@Rikers.org> <20001105160637.Z6207@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org yes, exactly what my comments stated. Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 01:52:24PM -0700, Tim Riker wrote: > > Alan, > > > > Perhaps I did not explain myself, or perhaps I misunderstand your > > comments. I was responding to a comment that we could just copy some of > > the optimizations from Pro64 over into gcc. > > That's hard to do, because the whole gcc has copyright assigned to FSF, > which means that either gcc steering committee would have to make an > exception from this for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some > code to FSF. > > Jakub -- Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten ... if I'd just been paying attention. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/