Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263817AbUDOFvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:51:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263828AbUDOFvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:51:47 -0400 Received: from smtp101.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.139]:15968 "HELO smtp101.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263817AbUDOFvp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:51:45 -0400 Message-ID: <407E22ED.6050802@yahoo.com.au> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:51:41 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040401 Debian/1.6-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: dvhltc@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mjbligh@us.ibm.com, ricklind@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 x86_64 sched domains patch References: <1081466480.10774.0.camel@farah> <20040414154456.78893f3f.ak@suse.de> <407D473B.8010109@yahoo.com.au> <20040414164135.75f1856f.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20040414164135.75f1856f.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1303 Lines: 42 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:14:19 +1000 > Nick Piggin wrote: >>Where is STREAM versus other kernels? You said you got >>best performance on a custom 2.4 kernel. Do we match >>that? > > > Differences were below the measurement error, so I consider it fixed. > great. > >>How is your performance for other things? I recall you >>may have told me about some other (smaller) issues you >>were seeing? > > > I haven't tested much yet. I can compare kernel compilations later. > That would be good. I don't expect you to do all the work, but Opteron being a non traditional NUMA, and me doing most of my testing on an old NUMAQ makes them quite important. Even if you just got some results for a couple of random benchmarks would be great. > Also I'm still somewhat hoping that the IBM benchmark team will take a stab at > it - they are much better than me at running many tests. > Well we've survived OSDL's STP tests as far as I know. A couple of regressions were found and fixed there, so that was good. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/