Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S132539AbRDHLdj>; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 07:33:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S132540AbRDHLda>; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 07:33:30 -0400
Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:16508 "EHLO mail.inka.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S132539AbRDHLdR>;
	Sun, 8 Apr 2001 07:33:17 -0400
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: goodbye
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104031800030.14090-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> <20010404012102Z131724-406+7418@vger.kernel.org> <20010408023228.L805@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20010407231956.A344@vitelus.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 12:58:22 +0200
From: Olaf Titz <olaf@bigred.inka.de>
Message-Id: <E14mCtj-0000YC-00@hunte.bigred.inka.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> It scares me that peoples' messages would be denied based on what
> degree of connection they choose to mail via. I sincerely hope that
> the DUL lists only list netblocks that are actively being used for
> spam. This would be sort of like the Usenet Death Penalty, instating
> bans on providers who refuse to deal with spamming. I think that's a

There's another list to do that: the original RBL. The DUL is only and
explicitly for the purpose of denying access based on the degree of
connection the users can afford.

Olaf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/