Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263448AbUDOIqc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 04:46:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262634AbUDOIqV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 04:46:21 -0400 Received: from mail3.codesense.com ([213.132.104.154]:40605 "EHLO mail3.codesense.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261821AbUDOIqT (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 04:46:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Failing back to INSANE timesource :) Time stopped today. From: Niclas Gustafsson To: john stultz Cc: lkml , Patricia Gaughen In-Reply-To: <1081967804.4705.105.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <1081416100.6425.45.camel@gmg.codesense.com> <1081465114.4705.4.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1081932857.17234.37.camel@gmg.codesense.com> <1081967804.4705.105.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1082018775.17234.137.camel@gmg.codesense.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:46:16 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1629 Lines: 52 ons 2004-04-14 klockan 20.36 skrev john stultz: > > Where can I see what the system is currently using as a timing source > > (TSC/HPET/PIT etc.)? > > Note the "Using tsc for high-res timesource" in your dmesg. > Yes, I noticed that, however, when it stops using tsc, is there a way to see what the current strategy is? I.e. to what time source it is falling back to? Or perhaps this is always the same? And because of this not implemented into the proc-fs? I have just briefly looked at the kernel source for this, I'll have a closer look today if I can find the time. > I'm working now to reproduce this w/ a 2G system here in our lab, and > just for completeness, could you also send me your BIOS revision number? > Sure, Here is some info from bios: Machine Type: 867373X Flash EEPROM Revision Level: PLE161AUS System Board Identifier: NA60B7Y0S3Q System Serial Number: KDZZ6FC Bios Date: 09/10/03 Some more info from Advanced/Cpu Frequency: Bus: 133 MHz Cpu Multiplier: 18 X Processor Speed: 2.8 GHz Single processor MP Table: Enabled MP Table Version: 1.4 Hyper-Threading technology: ---------- Just a thought, how much if any, increase in performance can one gain when disabling the Single processor MP Table option? It says, in the help on that options, that one can benefit from disabling it on a UP-system if I don't remember wrong now. Cheers, Niclas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/