Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261443AbUDOKVr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:21:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261804AbUDOKVr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:21:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:4011 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261443AbUDOKVo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:21:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [SECURITY] CAN-2004-0177 (was: Re: [SECURITY] CAN-2004-0075) From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Marc-Christian Petersen Cc: lkml , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Stephen Tweedie In-Reply-To: <200404150135.03714@WOLK> References: <20040414171147.GB23419@redhat.com> <200404142230.33553@WOLK> <200404150135.03714@WOLK> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1082024495.2100.41.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 15 Apr 2004 11:21:35 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 743 Lines: 22 Hi, On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 00:35, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > Okay, now while we are at fixing security holes, is there any chance we > > can get the attached patch in? > > Okay, we are at it, so what's about the attached one too? ;) > > In WOLK for some time too. I am not 100% sure if this is correct, but I think > it is. Andrew? Stephen? Looks OK to me. I'll see if I can detect any performance cost from it, but it's unlikely to be significant even if it's measurable. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/