Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263001AbUDOM5M (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:57:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263014AbUDOM5M (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:57:12 -0400 Received: from tristate.vision.ee ([194.204.30.144]:59839 "HELO mail.city.ee") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263001AbUDOM5K (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:57:10 -0400 Message-ID: <407E86A5.70700@vision.ee> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:57:09 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lenar_L=F5hmus?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040321) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denis Vlasenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: poor sata performance on 2.6 References: <200404150236.05894.kos@supportwizard.com> <407E35E0.3080902@vision.ee> <200404151440.23858.kos@supportwizard.com> <200404151537.38739.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> In-Reply-To: <200404151537.38739.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 21 Denis Vlasenko wrote: >27 Mb/s is not 'very' bad for 80Gb drive. > >Can you verify that drive indeed is able to do better >(quick test under Windows is in order)? It would be silly >to try to hunt down problem which do not exist. > >If problem does exist, try 2.4 kernels. > > This drive really _can_ do _much_ better. At least order of two. In my case - order of three. Lenar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/