Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264373AbUDORwy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:52:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263079AbUDORvK (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:51:10 -0400 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:55834 "EHLO MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264370AbUDORuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:50:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:50:42 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@localhost.localdomain To: "Martin J. Bligh" cc: Rajesh Venkatasubramanian , Andrea Arcangeli , , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree In-Reply-To: <178970000.1082049291@flay> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 750 Lines: 21 On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > I still think my list-of-lists patch fixes the original problem, and is > simpler ... I'll try to get it updated, and sent out. Please do, I never saw it before. Though I have to admit I'm sceptical: prio_tree appears to be well designed for the issue in question, list-of-lists sounds, well, no offence, but a bit of a hack. But we may well have overlooked the overhead of prio_tree's complexity relative to list, and need to reconsider options. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/