Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262961AbUDPKb6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:31:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262927AbUDPKb6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:31:58 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-245.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.245]:38925 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263014AbUDPKbA (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:31:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:28:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: John Bradford cc: Arjan van de Ven , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SATA support merge in 2.4.27 In-Reply-To: <200404161030.i3GAUrcB000356@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1085 Lines: 37 Since we are going over the cliff, lets get there faster! Has 2.2 or 2.0 ever been audited for security issues, and fixed? Whee this is fun! Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, John Bradford wrote: > Quote from Arjan van de Ven : > > > > --=-De0mPL9BnMYZGB8TurTV > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 12:20, John Bradford wrote: > > > Quote from Andre Hedrick : > > > > You are suggesting that 2.6 is not stable ? How could that be ? > > >=20 > > > It hasn't exactly been audited for security issues yet. > > > > neither has the biggest part of the 2.4 codebase. > > A valid point, but last time I checked, there were known exploits that had > been fixed in 2.4 but not in 2.6. > > John. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/