Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:34:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: markw@osdl.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: 2.6.5-mm5
Message-ID: <20040416103414.GA736@elte.hu>
References: <20040412221717.782a4b97.akpm@osdl.org> <200404151530.i3FFUI226872@mail.osdl.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200404151530.i3FFUI226872@mail.osdl.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 855
Lines: 25


* markw@osdl.org <markw@osdl.org> wrote:

> I have more results with DBT-2 on my 4-way Xeon system:
> 	http://developer.osdl.org/markw/fs/dbt2_project_results.html
> 
> It doesn't look like the latest cpu scheduler work is helping this
> workload.  I've also made sure that the database was set to use fsync
> instead of fdatasync so you can see if those fsync speedup patches are
> offering anything with this workload too.
> 
>            ext2  ext3
> 2.6.5-mm5  2165  1933
> 2.6.5-mm4  2180
> 2.6.5-mm3  2165  1930
> 2.6.5      2385

how stable are the results? Could the 2180 => 2165 drop be noise?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/