Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263698AbUDPUcR (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:32:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263702AbUDPUcM (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:32:12 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:64779 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263698AbUDPUby (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:31:54 -0400 To: Marcelo Tosatti cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS and kernel 2.6.x References: <1Lql8-6O3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LquO-6TK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LqOg-76p-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LrKo-7Sn-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LtM3-12d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <1Luf2-1kK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LDBL-uY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:31:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1LDBL-uY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (Marcelo Tosatti's message of "Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:40:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 708 Lines: 18 Marcelo Tosatti writes: > > Maaybe TCP should be the default then ? In case no one finds the reason > why NFS over UDP is slower on 2.6.x than 2.4.x. It seems there are > quite a few reports confirming the slowdown. Maybe Jamie Lokier is right in > theory? Problem is that older linux knfsd (early 2.4) tend to crash or hang after some time when they have to talk TCP. But I guess it would be still a better default ... -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/