Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263822AbUDPWmn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:42:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263916AbUDPWmX (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:42:23 -0400 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:56738 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263822AbUDPWf6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:35:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:35:48 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: linux-mm , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch? Message-ID: <20040416223548.GA27540@mail.shareable.org> References: <1080771361.1991.73.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1080771361.1991.73.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 17 Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > I've been looking at a discrepancy between msync() behaviour on 2.4.9 > and newer 2.4 kernels, and it looks like things changed again in > 2.5.68. When you say a discrepancy between 2.4.9 and newer 2.4 kernels, do you mean that the msync() behaviour changed during the 2.4 series? If so, what was the change? Thanks, -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/