Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129912AbQKEWpu>; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:45:50 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S130049AbQKEWpk>; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:45:40 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:22592 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129912AbQKEWpa>; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:45:30 -0500
Subject: Re: non-gcc linux?
To: jakub@redhat.com
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 22:46:02 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Tim@Rikers.org (Tim Riker), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List)
In-Reply-To: <20001105160637.Z6207@devserv.devel.redhat.com> from "Jakub Jelinek" at Nov 05, 2000 04:06:37 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E13sYY8-0005fb-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> That's hard to do, because the whole gcc has copyright assigned to FSF,
> which means that either gcc steering committee would have to make an
> exception from this for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some
> code to FSF.

Or a third party decides its a silly situation and does it anyway
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/