Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264026AbUDQSxZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:53:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264029AbUDQSxZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:53:25 -0400 Received: from mail4.bluewin.ch ([195.186.4.74]:650 "EHLO mail4.bluewin.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264026AbUDQSxY (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:53:24 -0400 Message-ID: <40817D22.2030107@bluewin.ch> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:53:22 +0200 From: Mario Vanoni User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, it, fr-fr, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: IMHO the usability of 2.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 930 Lines: 27 Tested 2.6.1[-mm#] and 2.6.5[-aa#]: inexplicables crashes, mouse, NFS etc., on 2-3 of our 8 Linux machines (0.1-6 years old), not usable for production, need five 9 (99.999). I don't have logs, always switched back to 2.4.25. Starting with AT&T UNIX SVR2 (1986, rock solid), later Linux 2.0, then 2.2, then 2.4, 2.4.17 was the 1st veritable stable 2.4 kernel. 2.4.25 had an uptime >=33 days before changing all machines to 2.4.26. Stable since 1-3 days. Feedback only and kind regards Mario Vanoni, _not_ in lkml! PS The standalone 9th M$ machine at job, boot each morning, some days needs 1-3 reboots on the same day. From the view point five 9 a piece of jewellery. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/