Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264058AbUDQVxB (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:53:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264060AbUDQVxA (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:53:00 -0400 Received: from florence.buici.com ([206.124.142.26]:10368 "HELO florence.buici.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264058AbUDQVw7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:52:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:52:57 -0700 From: Marc Singer To: William Lee Irwin III , Marc Singer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: vmscan.c heuristic adjustment for smaller systems Message-ID: <20040417215257.GA9691@flea> References: <20040417193855.GP743@holomorphy.com> <20040417212958.GA8722@flea> <20040417213333.GS743@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040417213333.GS743@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1593 Lines: 32 On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:33:33PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:38:55PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >> Marc Singer reported an issue where an embedded ARM system performed > >> poorly due to page replacement potentially prematurely replacing > >> mapped memory where there was very little mapped pagecache in use to > >> begin with. > >> Marc Singer has results where this is an improvement, and hopefully can > >> clarify as-needed. Help determining whether this policy change is an > >> improvement for a broader variety of systems would be appreciated. > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:29:58PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > > I have some numbers to clarify the 'improvement'. > > Setup: > > ARM922 CPU, 200MHz, 32MiB RAM > > NFS mounted rootfs, tcp, hard, v3, 4K blocks > > Test application copies 41MiB file and prints the elapsed time > > The two scenarios differ only in the setting of /proc/sys/vm/swappiness. > > This doesn't match your first response. Anyway, this one is gets > scrapped. I guess if swappiness solves it, then so much the better. Huh? Where do you see a discrepency? I don't think I claimed that the test program performance changed. The noticeable difference is in interactivity once the page cache fills. IMHO, 30 seconds to do a file listing on /proc is extreme. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/