Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264156AbUDRLJh (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2004 07:09:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264157AbUDRLJg (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2004 07:09:36 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:49113 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264156AbUDRLJf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2004 07:09:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:06:58 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sf.net Subject: [PATCH] Oprofilefs cant handle > 99 cpus Message-ID: <20040418110658.GC26086@krispykreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 24 Hi, Oprofilefs cant handle > 99 cpus. This should fix it. Anton ===== oprofile_stats.c 1.6 vs edited ===== --- 1.6/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_stats.c Mon Jan 19 17:33:51 2004 +++ edited/oprofile_stats.c Sun Apr 18 19:46:35 2004 @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ continue; cpu_buf = &cpu_buffer[i]; - snprintf(buf, 6, "cpu%d", i); + snprintf(buf, 10, "cpu%d", i); cpudir = oprofilefs_mkdir(sb, dir, buf); /* Strictly speaking access to these ulongs is racy, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/