Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264305AbUDSI6U (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:58:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264306AbUDSI6U (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:58:20 -0400 Received: from levante.wiggy.net ([195.85.225.139]:56210 "EHLO mx1.wiggy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264305AbUDSI6O (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:58:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:58:10 +0200 From: Wichert Akkerman To: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tg3 driver - make use of binary-only firmware optional Message-ID: <20040419085809.GA585@wiggy.net> Mail-Followup-To: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com References: <20040418135534.GA6142@andaco.de> <20040418180811.0b2e2567.davem@redhat.com> <20040419080439.GB11586@andaco.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040419080439.GB11586@andaco.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 17 Previously Andreas Jochens wrote: > Would the patch be acceptable if the firmware parts were kept in tg3.c > as they are now but #ifdef'd out when CONFIG_TIGON3_FIRMWARE is not set? Is there any reason for not using the hotplug firmware infrastructure? Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/