Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264247AbUDSPgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:36:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264246AbUDSPgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:36:40 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:21515 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264266AbUDSPgb (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:36:31 -0400 To: Jan Kasprzak cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: x86_64 bad frame in signal deliver References: <1MHWN-3ga-31@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:36:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1MHWN-3ga-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (Jan Kasprzak's message of "Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:30:17 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 562 Lines: 17 Jan Kasprzak writes: > > Does that mean that proftpd segfaulted inside user space (and is thus > buggy or even insecure) - as address rip:41ecaa suggests, or is it some kind > of kernel bug? Yes, we know every message that isn't output by i386 is a kernel bug. proftpd segfaulted. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/