Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261928AbUDSVzM (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:55:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261930AbUDSVzL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:55:11 -0400 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:12305 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261928AbUDSVzA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:55:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:54:50 +0200 From: Willy TARREAU To: Joe Korty Cc: cramerj@intel.com, scott.feldman@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] e1000 fails on 2.4.26+bk with CONFIG_SMP=y Message-ID: <20040419215450.GA331@pcw.home.local> References: <20040416224422.GA19095@tsunami.ccur.com> <20040417072455.GD596@alpha.home.local> <20040419165425.GA3988@tsunami.ccur.com> <20040419193930.GA28340@alpha.home.local> <20040419214247.GA5273@tsunami.ccur.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040419214247.GA5273@tsunami.ccur.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2479 Lines: 52 On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:42:47PM -0400, Joe Korty wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:54:25PM -0400, Joe Korty wrote: > >> > >> Uniprocessor 2.4.26 works fine. > >> Uniprocessor 2.4.26 + local apic works fine. > >> Uniprocessor 2.4.26 + local apic + io apic fails. > > > > interesting. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to try on the machine I told > > you about last day. But right here, I have a dual athlon communicating > > with an alpha, both with e1000 (544) in 2.4.26. Since there's a PCI > > bridge on your quad, I wonder if the IOAPIC doesn't trigger an interrupt > > routing problem with bridges. Are all the ports unusable or do some of > > them work reliably in APIC mode ? > > I just verified that the Quad Ethernet board works with 2.6.5 SMP, so it > is unlikely to be a bridge or other hardware problem. Sorry that was not what I meant. I meant that the 2.4.26 irq routing or I don't know what might experience difficulties due to the presence of a PCI bridge on this board, and potentially this one particularly. I once encountered such a problem in a desktop machine which would only see 3 out of the 4 ports on an adaptec quad board, depending on the PCI slot it was fit in ! It turned out to be a problem with region alignment or something like this which was not correctly forwarded through the bridge (bios bug or so at initialization). > For 2.4.26, the Dell 650 has an Intel 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller > soldered in, which also uses the e1000 driver, and that works fine, so > we know the 2.4.26 e1000 driver works with some of these Intel chips. OK, same here. > When the Quad board works, it negotiates down to 10 MBits/sec Half Duplex. > Not sure yet if this is what it is supposed to be doing in our environment. I remember something like this not long ago. It was what ethtool reported, but the card was running either gigabit or a forced 100FDX without auto-neg on the other side, I don't remember. Can you try a simple 4-pairs cable between two ports on the quad to check what media is negociated ? Also, can you cat /proc/interrupts with and without io/apic, and try without ACPI as Zwane suggested ? Cheers, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/