Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261932AbUDSV45 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:56:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261982AbUDSV45 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:56:57 -0400 Received: from mailgate.Cadence.COM ([158.140.2.1]:16027 "EHLO mailgate.Cadence.COM") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261932AbUDSV4u (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:56:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [BUG] e1000 fails on 2.4.26+bk with CONFIG_SMP=y From: Chris Croswhite Reply-To: csc@cadence.com To: joe.korty@ccur.com Cc: Willy Tarreau , cramerj@intel.com, scott.feldman@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040419214247.GA5273@tsunami.ccur.com> References: <20040416224422.GA19095@tsunami.ccur.com> <20040417072455.GD596@alpha.home.local> <20040419165425.GA3988@tsunami.ccur.com> <20040419193930.GA28340@alpha.home.local> <20040419214247.GA5273@tsunami.ccur.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Cadence Design Systems, Inc Message-Id: <1082412219.5804.241.camel@d158140025182.Cadence.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:03:39 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1986 Lines: 46 FYI, using the dual 85540 board w/e1000 works fine on a quad SMP w/APIC support. However, if I try to bond, I get immediate detonation. On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 14:42, Joe Korty wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:54:25PM -0400, Joe Korty wrote: > >> > >> Uniprocessor 2.4.26 works fine. > >> Uniprocessor 2.4.26 + local apic works fine. > >> Uniprocessor 2.4.26 + local apic + io apic fails. > > > > interesting. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to try on the machine I told > > you about last day. But right here, I have a dual athlon communicating > > with an alpha, both with e1000 (544) in 2.4.26. Since there's a PCI > > bridge on your quad, I wonder if the IOAPIC doesn't trigger an interrupt > > routing problem with bridges. Are all the ports unusable or do some of > > them work reliably in APIC mode ? > > I just verified that the Quad Ethernet board works with 2.6.5 SMP, so it > is unlikely to be a bridge or other hardware problem. > > For 2.4.26, the Dell 650 has an Intel 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller > soldered in, which also uses the e1000 driver, and that works fine, so > we know the 2.4.26 e1000 driver works with some of these Intel chips. > > When the Quad board works, it negotiates down to 10 MBits/sec Half Duplex. > Not sure yet if this is what it is supposed to be doing in our environment. > > Regards, > Joe > > PS: do you CC'ed Intel guys have some insights or data for us? > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/