Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263101AbUDTPIu (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:08:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263124AbUDTPIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:08:49 -0400 Received: from mail.dsa-ac.de ([62.112.80.99]:4616 "EHLO k2.dsa-ac.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263101AbUDTPIs (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:08:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:08:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Subject: Re: [somewhat OT] binary modules agaaaain In-Reply-To: <200404201611.07832.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 671 Lines: 23 On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > A binary module is "considered good" if > > This is a false assumption IMO no binary only modules can be "good". I agree! That was just an idea to make Linux life easier __if__ it __must__ live with binary modules. Thanks Guennadi --------------------------------- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH Pascalstr. 28 D-52076 Aachen Germany - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/