Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129117AbQKEX1m>; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:27:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129121AbQKEX1d>; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:27:33 -0500
Received: from vp175121.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.175.121]:19725 "EHLO
	moisil.dev.hydraweb.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129117AbQKEX1T>; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:27:19 -0500
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 15:26:16 -0800
Message-Id: <200011052326.eA5NQGm16983@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com>
From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu>
To: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>
Cc: Tim Riker <Tim@Rikers.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: non-gcc linux?
In-Reply-To: <20001105234225.J443@cerebro.laendle>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.17 (i586))
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 23:42:25 +0100, Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 04:06:37PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:

>> for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some code to FSF.
> 
> Which is the standard procedure that the FSF requires for all it's
> programs to be able to defend them

... or sell them under a different license. Not that they would, but they
could, if they really wanted to.

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/