Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262910AbUDUMQT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:16:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264536AbUDUMQT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:16:19 -0400 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:36528 "EHLO MTVMIME03.enterprise.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262910AbUDUMQR (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:16:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:16:10 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@localhost.localdomain To: Sean Neakums cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-rc1-mm1 In-Reply-To: <6ubrllpyr9.fsf@zork.zork.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1045 Lines: 33 On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Sean Neakums wrote: > > As is this (I assume debugging) message: > > Apr 20 16:20:24 slagpiece kernel: xterm: mremap moved 49 cows > > ______ > < Moo! > > ------ > \ ^__^ > \ (oo)\_______ > (__)\ )\/\ > ||----w | > || || Lovely! Thanks for your report, and especially your art - you are the lucky winner of a huge churn of milk for first report of this message, just send your details etc. etc. Yes, more or less a debugging message: nothing bad has happened, just something rather inefficient, and we'd like to get some idea of how much it occurs in practice. xterm, eh? I wouldn't have guessed that. Quite a herd. I hoped a whimsical message might be reported more than a boring one! Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/