Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:40:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:40:18 -0400 Received: from isis.its.uow.edu.au ([130.130.68.21]:49315 "EHLO isis.its.uow.edu.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:40:05 -0400 Message-ID: <3AD1F315.2B4ED639@uow.edu.au> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 10:36:21 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18-0.22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eloy A. Paris" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Processes hanging in D state in 2.4.3 - any findings? In-Reply-To: <20010409114828.A25594@antenas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Eloy A. Paris" wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I have seen several messages posted to l-k about people reporting > processes (mozilla most of the time) hanging in the D state in 2.4.3, > but I haven't seen someone posting a possible explanation or solution > to the problem. It's due to problems in the rw_semaphore implementation. These were basically unused for a year, then a couple of weeks ago we started using them, and the problems came to light. > Anyone knows where does the problem lie, or a workaround for the > problem? I hate going through the fsck that happens when umount fails > because processes are in the D state... I put out a patch yesterday which will fix the problem. Discussions are ongoing... - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/