Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261817AbUDUWBA (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:01:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262208AbUDUWBA (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:01:00 -0400 Received: from fmr10.intel.com ([192.55.52.30]:52706 "EHLO fmsfmr003.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261817AbUDUWA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:00:57 -0400 Subject: Re: IO-APIC on nforce2 [PATCH] + [PATCH] for nmi_debug=1 + [PATCH] for idle=C1halt, 2.6.5 From: Len Brown To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Allen Martin In-Reply-To: References: <1KkKQ-2v9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <1Kqdx-6E1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <1KH4I-3W9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LgOQ-7px-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <1LlEY-36q-11@gated-at.bofh.it> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1082584816.16333.113.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 21 Apr 2004 18:00:16 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1382 Lines: 33 On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:07, Andi Kleen wrote: > Len Brown writes: > > > While I don't want to get into the business of maintaining > > a dmi_scan entry for every system with this issue, I think > > it might be a good idea to add a couple of example entries > > for high volume systems for which there is no BIOS fix available. > > Or do a generic fix: check for the PCI-ID of the Nforce2 and when > it is true and the timer is wrong just correct it. That's ugly, > but it's probably the best solution for such a common issue > (and the IO-APIC code is already filled with workarounds anyways) IMO the fact that the IOAPIC code is full of workarounds is a reason NOT to add another one. > One problem is that this likely must happen before the PCI quirks > run. In the x86-64 code I have special "early PCI scanning" code > for this that could be copied. I don't have a Nforce2, but when > someone is willing to test I can do a patch for this. If this issue had no other fix, I'd agree that the complexity is worth it. But a BIOS upgrade fixes this -- so I think dmi-scan simplicity is the way to go. -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/