Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263748AbUDVAsx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:48:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263754AbUDVAsx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:48:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:41423 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263748AbUDVAsw (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:48:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:47:55 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@thoron.boston.redhat.com To: Denis Vlasenko cc: "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , Subject: Re: Large inlines in include/linux/skbuff.h In-Reply-To: <200404212226.28350.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 603 Lines: 21 On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > What shall be done with this? I'll make patch to move locking functions > into net/core/skbuff.c unless there is some reason not to do it. How will these changes impact performance? I asked this last time you posted about inlines and didn't see any response. - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/