Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 16:11:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 16:11:12 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:36625 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 16:10:57 -0400 Subject: Re: No 100 HZ timer ! To: mbs@mc.com (Mark Salisbury) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:12:16 +0100 (BST) Cc: jdike@karaya.com (Jeff Dike), schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01040914220214.01893@pc-eng24.mc.com> from "Mark Salisbury" at Apr 09, 2001 02:19:28 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > this is one of linux biggest weaknesses. the fixed interval timer is a > throwback. it should be replaced with a variable interval timer with interrupts > on demand for any system with a cpu sane/modern enough to have an on-chip > interrupting decrementer. (i.e just about any modern chip) Its worth doing even on the ancient x86 boards with the PIT. It does require some driver changes since while(time_before(jiffies, we_explode)) poll_things(); no longer works - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/