Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264655AbUDVTwU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:52:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264658AbUDVTwP (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:52:15 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:524 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264655AbUDVTwF (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:52:05 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" cc: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Large inlines in include/linux/skbuff.h References: <1NAJr-61F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <1NRqX-2GI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <1NRqX-2GI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:51:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1NRqX-2GI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (David S. Miller's message of "Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:50:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 18 "David S. Miller" writes: > > He's asking you to test and quantify the performance changes that > occur as a result of this patch, not to figure it out via calculations > in your head :-) I bet it will be completely unnoticeable in macrobenchmarks. The only way to measure a difference would be likely to use some unrealistic microbenchmark (program that calls this in a tight loop) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/