Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264806AbUDWNfa (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:35:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264807AbUDWNfa (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:35:30 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:40974 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264806AbUDWNf0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:35:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:35:21 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: raven@themaw.net Cc: Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.6-rc2-mm1 Message-ID: <20040423143521.A1961@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , raven@themaw.net, Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Kernel Mailing List References: <20040421014544.37942eb4.akpm@osdl.org> <20040423131149.B1218@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from raven@themaw.net on Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:33:10PM +0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 747 Lines: 17 On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:33:10PM +0800, raven@themaw.net wrote: > autofs3 requires it to behave as per the little description I put in. > > So is the first version what we want? > Should I do a patch which reverts it or should I do a new patch that > adds the prototype I originally missed? > > Be good to clear up what I need to do before I spend more time on it. It's say keep may_umount as is, and do a no-argument may_umount_tree in namespace.c aswell. As for what patches is best ask akpm. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/