Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261326AbUDWUVg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:21:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261313AbUDWUVg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:21:36 -0400 Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:248 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261340AbUDWUVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:21:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Unable to read UDF fs on a DVD From: Pat LaVarre To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net Cc: linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040423195004.GA1885@dreamland.darkstar.lan> References: <20040423162801.GA5396@dreamland.darkstar.lan><1082743002.3099. 23.camel@patibmrh9><20040423195004.GA1885@dreamland.darkstar.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1082751675.3163.106.camel@patibmrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 23 Apr 2004 14:21:15 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2004 20:21:32.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[911EB040:01 C42970] X-imss-version: 2.0 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:16.79060 C:49 M:1 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2614 Lines: 82 > http://web.tiscali.it/kronoz/ucf_test.log > I don't see anything strange. I now agree, that disc passed fsck and mount well enough to make the ls failure interesting. What to try next after fsck passes, I do not know, ouch, sorry. Offline I'm working to comment the fs/udf/ source. Even me finishing that might not do you much good, unless we can figure out how to reproduce your trouble at my desk. Pat LaVarre P.S. Five postscripts: 1) > even with ide-scsi, though. Whoa. You weren't engaging in the taboo act of running ide-scsi in 2.6 back when ls failed, were you? (If you are, then please remove ide-scsi, substitute ide-cd, and confirm or deny that exercise actually made no difference.) 2) The disc didn't actually pass the phgfsck without complaint: The standard phgfsck egrep is: $ egrep -i '(info|warning|error):' http://web.tiscali.it/kronoz/ucf_test.log PVD 72 Warning: Volume Set Identifier: "040420_0906", PVD 72 Warning: Volume Set Identifier: "040420_0906", Error: Number of AVDPs less than 2: 1, AVDP at 256 $ Non-compliance! All the same, I'm guessing these complaints do Not explain the ls failure, since to my newbie ear these sound like mount issues and we know you can mount. 3) I can't now rapidly reproduce the collection of file lengths you report, because sparse files in UDF, even when the underlying volume is not sparse, as yet crash my Linux-2.6.5. 3) > Btw, don't know if it's related but I was unable to run ucf_test without > scsi emulation: it complained about unknown image chunk size. I can't > read files even with ide-scsi, though. Yes phgfsck trouble like that is normal, thanks for asking. 4) > > P.S. The subscriber-only archives of linux_udf@h... currently show > > Linux-2.6.5 issues now under discussion, including an issue people have > > reproduced by downloading a huge trial .exe into Windows and then > > copying a file of more than 2 GiB to the disc. > > I think that this is a different issue, files on my disk are smaller. I agree your conclusion is reasonable, I do not myself yet know the udf.ko code well enough to firmly confirm or deny your conclusion. 5) > http://web.tiscali.it/kronoz/ucf_test.log Any chance this link will still work, a year from now? (I ask because I'm hoping to see a collection of observed UDF non-compliance come into being.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/