Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262062AbUDXI2r (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 04:28:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262063AbUDXI2r (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 04:28:47 -0400 Received: from fmr02.intel.com ([192.55.52.25]:20447 "EHLO caduceus.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262062AbUDXI2p (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 04:28:45 -0400 Subject: RE: PROBLEM: Second processor not responding in 2.4.21 and later From: Len Brown To: Marc Rieffel Cc: Denis Vlasenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1082795309.22229.8.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 24 Apr 2004 04:28:29 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1303 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 12:29, Marc Rieffel wrote: > It looks like things changed dramatically from 2.4.20-pre4 to > 2.4.20-pre5. Can you help me figure out which of the changes was > responsible? > > Thanks. > > Kernel Fail Pass Fail% > > 2.4.18-27.7.xsmp 0 3314 0.0000 > 2.4.18 5 4206 0.0012 > 2.4.19 12 25786 0.0005 > 2.4.20-pre4 2 586 0.0034 > 2.4.20-pre5 2 49 0.0392 > 2.4.20-pre6 12 745 0.0159 > 2.4.20 55 3128 0.0173 > 2.4.20-20.7smp 483 15427 0.0304 > 2.4.21-4.0.1.ELsmp 155 7278 0.0209 While a difference between 2.4.20-pre4 and -pre5 may be a clue, it isn't the root cause, because they're both broken. Looks like only 2.4.18-27.7.xsmp (whatever that is) got 0 failures. Any chance you can run a test with, say, 2.6.5? It might also be interesting to know what compiler built each kernel.. cheers, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/