Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:39:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:39:33 -0400 Received: from femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.140]:48623 "EHLO femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:39:17 -0400 Message-ID: <008401c0c167$73f14d80$8d19b018@c779218a> From: "Nicholas Knight" To: "David St.Clair" , In-Reply-To: <986664971.1224.4.camel@bugeyes.wcu.edu> Subject: Re: UDMA(66) drive coming up as UDMA(33)? Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:39:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "David St.Clair" To: Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 10:36 AM Subject: UDMA(66) drive coming up as UDMA(33)? > I'm trying to get my hard drive to use UDMA/66. I'm thinking the cable > is not being detected. When the HPT366 bios is set to UDMA 4; using > hdparm -t, I get a transfer rate of 19.51 MB/s. When the HPT366 bios is > set to PIO 4 the transfer rate is the same. Is this normal for a UDMA/66 > drive? What makes me think something is wrong is that the log says The speed is dependant on the drive, and has absilutely nothing to do with the UDMA mode, beyond that the controller and cable need to be able to support at least the speed the drive is recieving/outputting data in order for the drive to operate at full speed, 19.51MB/sec sounds right for a good 7200RPM HDD > > "ide2: BM-DMA at 0xbc00-0xbc07, BIOS settings: hde:pio" <-- PIO? hmm this is a little odd but I don't know the ins and outs of the HPT366 controller > > and > > "hde: 27067824 sectors (13859 MB) w/371KiB Cache, CHS=26853/16/63, > UDMA(33)" <--- UDMA(33)? shouldn't it be UDMA(66)? > this certainly sounds like it's not detecting the cable properly... have you tried replacing it with a new cable that you KNOW supports ATA/66? > HPT366: onboard version of chipset, pin1=1 pin2=2 is the HPT366 controller in an add-in card or built into the motherboard? it looks like it's builtin from this line the bottom line here is that the cable probably isn't being detected properly for some reason, I doubt if it's a kernel problem, the cable is probably "bad", try picking up a new ATA/66+ cable and putting it in there this shouldn't actually cause you problems unless you're often transferring more than 33MB/sec though, which isn't likely on a desktop system, ATA/66 and ATA/100 are *generaly* overkill for most desktop systems, even for many powerusers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/