Message-ID: <408A8380.4010209@cox-internet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:10:56 -0500
From: billy rose <billyrose@cox-internet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mohamed Aslan <mkernel@linuxmail.org>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Rewrite Kernel
References: <20040424132402.7EBB923AB1@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040424132402.7EBB923AB1@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1042
Lines: 26

Have you ever written a complete program in assembler? I don't mean a 
small utility, I mean a full application. If you started today 
transcribing the kernel sources for 2.6.x, by the time you finished (not 
including debugging) the standard would no doubt be kernel 4.x or 
beyond. Your assembler version would be vastly outdated, lack features, 
and the methodology would be far behind what will be common at that 
time. - Just my opinion -

Mohamed Aslan wrote:
> No I Could Create Assembly Code Faster Than Gcc
> Gcc 2.95 was good but 3 isn't as 2,it's not my words linus recommended compiling kernel with 2.95
> don't forget something assemblying requires less time than compiling


=====
Billy

"There's some milk in the fridge that's about to go bad...
     And there it goes..." --Bobby


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/