Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262347AbUDXPYs (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:24:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262370AbUDXPYs (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:24:48 -0400 Received: from outmx002.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.3.52]:464 "EHLO outmx002.isp.belgacom.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262347AbUDXPYq (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:24:46 -0400 Subject: RE:IDE throughput in 2.6 - it's good! From: FabF To: lkml Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1082820563.2268.10.camel@bluerhyme.real3> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:29:23 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030212) (outmx002.isp.belgacom.be) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 909 Lines: 45 Ken, AFAICS, some hdparm -t or dbench 1 will reveal slight variations between 2.4 & 2.6 ... In some cases 2.4 will be better. Running dbench 10 we have : 2.6 202 48.57 234 22.28 234 16.00 234 12.48 234 10.23 234 8.66 234 7.52 431 12.37 463 11.86 464 10.76 2.4.21 119 15.06 151 10.75 282 15.54 301 13.44 313 11.84 352 11.49 360 10.38 360 9.29 360 8.42 Here's what we can call a server direction.2.6 is unbeatable there due to IO scheduler (i.e. As-iosched, cfq and noop rock'n'roll) There are no good conclusions at all although ,at this state of development, IMHO, 2.4 seems more 'client friendly' and 2.6 server oriented in this chapter. Regards, FabF - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/