Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262370AbUDXPpW (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:45:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262388AbUDXPpW (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:45:22 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:33942 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262370AbUDXPpT (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:45:19 -0400 Message-ID: <408A8B84.4070506@maine.rr.com> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:45:08 -0400 From: "David B. Stevens" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mohamed Aslan CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Rewrite Kernel References: <20040424132402.7EBB923AB1@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20040424132402.7EBB923AB1@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 598 Lines: 16 Mohamed Aslan wrote: > No I Could Create Assembly Code Faster Than Gcc > Gcc 2.95 was good but 3 isn't as 2,it's not my words linus recommended compiling kernel with 2.95 > don't forget something assemblying requires less time than compiling Well then do it and show us. Cheers, Dave PS:The elitist said that about FORTRAN as well and were _WRONG_ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/