Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261988AbUDXX6Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:58:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261991AbUDXX6Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:58:25 -0400 Received: from smtp015.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.173.59]:33931 "HELO smtp015.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261988AbUDXX6Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:58:24 -0400 Message-ID: <408AFF1C.903@yahoo.com.au> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:58:20 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040401 Debian/1.6-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FabF CC: lkml Subject: Re: IDE throughput in 2.6 - it's good! References: <1082820563.2268.10.camel@bluerhyme.real3> In-Reply-To: <1082820563.2268.10.camel@bluerhyme.real3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 802 Lines: 19 FabF wrote: > Here's what we can call a server direction.2.6 is unbeatable there due > to IO scheduler (i.e. As-iosched, cfq and noop rock'n'roll) Well, which one were you using just now? AS I assume? > > There are no good conclusions at all although ,at this state of > development, IMHO, 2.4 seems more 'client friendly' and 2.6 server > oriented in this chapter. IO scheduler wise, AS should be good for "clients" (ie. desktop) because it is the desktop where AS's possible small throughput regressions are not a big problem even if they did arise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/