Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262217AbUDYHcQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2004 03:32:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262339AbUDYHcP (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2004 03:32:15 -0400 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:19731 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262217AbUDYHcO (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2004 03:32:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:29:18 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Horst von Brand Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: File system compression, not at the block layer Message-ID: <20040425072918.GA21148@alpha.home.local> References: <20040424073622.GN596@alpha.home.local> <200404250305.i3P355eF003826@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404250305.i3P355eF003826@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1730 Lines: 33 On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 11:05:05PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > > Haven't you noticed that drives with many > > platters are always faster than their cousins with fewer platters ? And > > I don't speak about access time, but about sequential reads. > > Have you ever wondered how they squeeze 16 or more platters into that slim > enclosure? If you take them apart, the question evaporates: There are 2 or > 3 platters in them, no more. The "many platters" are an artifact of BIOS' > "disk geometry" description. I know, I was speaking about physical platters of course. Mark Hann told me in private that he disagreed with me, so I checked recent disks (36, 73, 147 GB SCSI with 1, 2, 4 platters) and he was right, they have exactly the same spec concerning speed. But I said that I remember the times when I regularly did this test on disks that I was integrating about 7-8 years ago, they were 2.1, 4.3, 6.4 GB (1,2,3 platters), and I'm fairly certain that the 1-platter performed at about 5 MB/s while the 6.4 was around 12 MB/s. BTW, the 9GB SCSI I have in my PC does about 28 MB/s for 1 platter, while its 18 GB equivalent (2 platters) does about 51. So I think that what I observed remained true for such capacities, but changed on bigger disks because of mechanical constraints. Afterall, what's 18 GB now ? Less than one twentieth of the biggest disk. Anyway, this is off-topic, so that's my last post on LKML on the subject. Regards, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/