From: "Matt H." <lkml@lpbproductions.com>
Reply-To: lkml@lpbproduction.scom
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:56:33 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51
References: <1082750045.12989.199.camel@watt.suse.com> <408D3FEE.1030603@namesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <408D3FEE.1030603@namesys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200404261256.33342.lkml@lpbproductions.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 719
Lines: 20


> Please reject the xattr and acl patch for ReiserFS V3, and wait a week
> or two for ReiserFS V4 to ship to you instead.
>


Wasn't ReiserFS V4 promised months ago ? Are you that sure when it ships, it's 
going to be merge into mainline or let alone the -mm tree ? 

As a ReiserFS user, I'm fully behind theese new changes. I'd rather stay with 
the current fs I have ( with new features slowly trinkling in ) , then switch 
to a new untested fs ( ReiserFS V4 ).

Matt H.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/