Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263698AbUD0CtD (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:49:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263701AbUD0CtC (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:49:02 -0400 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:16399 "HELO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263698AbUD0CtA (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:49:00 -0400 Date: 27 Apr 2004 04:48:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 04:48:59 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andi Kleen , Darren Hart , lkml , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: sched_domains and Stream benchmark Message-ID: <20040427024859.GC11321@colin2.muc.de> References: <1N7xQ-7fh-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <1083018633.3070.8.camel@farah> <20040427023327.GB11321@colin2.muc.de> <408DC909.7030605@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <408DC909.7030605@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 20 > Now what is wrong with it? I thought you said it is OK Old problem; STREAM does not scale linearly as it should. > now that Ingo's balance-on-clone is implemented, and > that you also saw similar variation in results with > numasched? I said it was fixed with Ingo's patch, nothing more. The patch isn't in mm5 yet as far as I know. There were some small variations left (a few percent, much less than 25%), but these were there even with 2.4. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/